Gordon L. Heath
  • Home
  • About
  • Publications
  • Blog
  • War: Now and the Future
  • Serendipity
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Contact
  • MIsc
  • MIsc 2
  • MIsc 3
  • MIsc 4
​My blog posts revolve around my interests and vocation as a historian: the intersection of history and contemporary church life, the intersection of history and contemporary politics, serendipitous discoveries in archives or on research trips, publications and research projects, upcoming conferences, and speaking engagements.

The views expressed in these blogs represent the views of the authors, and not necessarily those of any organizations with which they are associated.

Disobeying Unlawful Orders in the Military

12/20/2025

0 Comments

 
Picture
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Color_photograph_of_judges%27_bench_at_IMT.jpg
The recent brouhaha in the US over soldiers disobeying unlawful orders reminds me of comments in a book I published a few years ago. In sum, what is important for Christians to know is that there are provisions in much of the western world's military for soldiers to disobey such orders.
The post-World War Two Nuremberg trials concluded that “just following orders” did not absolve military personal or their leaders from guilt. And that has been reflected in various statements that make provisions for disobeying unlawful orders, albeit rooted less in religious notions and more on arguments based on jurisprudence, human rights, or theories of conscience (although there is a residue of Christian notions of conscience assumed).[1] What that means is that soldiers in some countries are not required to obey unjust orders that break international laws. 
 
For instance, in the Canadian military, it seems soldiers are not required to obey an “unlawful” command, and may, in fact, be punished for carrying out unlawful orders. The Queen’s Regulations and Orders for the Canadian Armed Forces reads:
 
"(B) Usually there will be no doubt as to whether a command or order is lawful or unlawful. In a situation, however, where the subordinate does not know the law or is uncertain of it he shall, even though he doubts the lawfulness of the command, obey unless the command is manifestly unlawful.
C) An officer or non-commissioned member is not justified in obeying a command or order that is manifestly unlawful. In other words, if a subordinate commits a crime in complying with a command that is manifestly unlawful, he is liable to be punished for the crime by a civil or military court. A manifestly unlawful command or order is one that would appear to a person of ordinary sense and understanding to be clearly illegal; for example, a command by an officer or non-commissioned member to shoot a member for only having used disrespectful words or a command to shoot an unarmed child."[2]
 
Other governments have similar types of statements. For instance, the United States military is guided by the Uniform Code of Military Justice (§890. Art. 90, page A2-35)[3] and the Manual for Courts-Martial United States (Article 90, page IV-13).[4] Soldiers are required to obey lawful orders, but not unlawful order. 
 
In the UK, the expectation in the Armed Forces Act 2006 (Section 12)[5] is much the same. The expectation is to obey only lawful orders.
 
Of course, arguing one’s case as to what is just or unjust may be difficult, especially in the heat of battle. And, as the Manual for Courts-Martial United States states, an order “is disobeyed at the peril of the subordinate.” Stated bluntly, the consequences of misjudging the situation could be fatal at worst, especially in a military of a despotic regime.
 
In conclusion, while some governments allow for discretionary decision making by their soldiers on matters related to lawful orders, most militaries in the world do not. Even in democracies making a case for an unjust order is incredibly difficult and dangerous. And, unlike in the movies, the good guys do not always win. 
 
For further exploration of such issues, see Christians, the State, and War: An Ancient Tradition for the Modern World (2022).[6]
 

 


[1] Anders Schinkel, Conscience and Conscientious Objections (Amsterdam: Pallas, 2007).
[2] Queen’s Regulations and Orders for the Canadian Armed Forces, 19.015. https://www.canada.ca/en/department-national-defence/corporate/policies-standards/queens-regulations-orders.html
[3] https://jsc.defense.gov/Portals/99/Documents/UCMJ%20-%2020December2019.pdf
[4] https://jsc.defense.gov/Portals/99/2023%20MCM%20(w_%20preface)%20(2023_09_15).pdf?ver=DYv_dgnVlSTjgwUwpO2piQ%3d%3d
[5]
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/cy/ukpga/2006/52/notes?wrap=true&view=plain#:~:text=Section%2012:%20Disobedience%20to%20lawful,are%20more%20routine%20in%20character.)
[6] https://www.bloomsbury.com/ca/christians-the-state-and-war-9781978712911/

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    March 2026
    February 2026
    January 2026
    December 2025
    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • Home
  • About
  • Publications
  • Blog
  • War: Now and the Future
  • Serendipity
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Contact
  • MIsc
  • MIsc 2
  • MIsc 3
  • MIsc 4