|
My blog posts revolve around my interests and vocation as a historian: the intersection of history and contemporary church life, the intersection of history and contemporary politics, serendipitous discoveries in archives or on research trips, publications and research projects, upcoming conferences, and speaking engagements.
The views expressed in these blogs represent the views of the authors, and not necessarily those of any organizations with which they are associated. |
|
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_First_Methodist_chapel_called_%22The_Foundry%22_-_Capel_Cyntaf_y_Methodistiaid_Wesleyaidd_a_Adnabyddid_Wrth_%22Y_Foundry%22.jpeg One reason why eighteenth-century English Methodism was such a spiritual dynamo was that much of it was built through the labors of lay (non-ordained) people. In fact, one cannot understand the birth and growth of the movement without acknowledging that vital role of lay people. A number of Methodists were ordained priests in the Church of England (John and Charles Wesley being two examples), but the need for workers was great. And it did not take long to realize that the work would have to be scaled back if lay preachers were not used.
Lay leaders – both men and women – were involved in a host of functions, one of them being preaching. However, while allowing non-ordained people to preach was a blessing it was also something that caused frequent troubles. Not only did it lead to criticism from opponents of the movement, but it also led to tensions within the movement. Many of the movement’s leaders had no formal theological training. Many were “on the road” by themselves (often a recipe for disaster!). And there was also the concern over varying or dissenting views among preachers (ordained or otherwise). Since many had no education, efforts were made to provide materials for study. Lay candidates usually served a year or so on probation and then joined the ranks. John seems to have been the more understanding of brothers, whereas Charles was quite concerned for things that were being done in the church to be done “properly.” As a result, he could sometimes be quite harsh. For instance, Charles once wrote in a letter: “John Wesley made a preacher of a tailor. I with the Lord’s help shall make a tailor of him again.”[1] It seems like a bit of a “good cop, bad cop” arrangement. (In fact, their different approaches caused some stress between the two brothers – but that is another story.) John tried to stay in contact with the lay leaders, dispensing sage advice such as: “Avoid all nastiness, dirt, slovenliness, both in your person, clothes, house and all about you...Clean yourselves of lice...Cure yourself and your family of the itch...Mend your clothes, or I shall never expect you to mend your lives. Let none ever see a ragged Methodist.”[2] Several statements were developed to formalize and make uniform the expectations for Methodist preachers. What follows are two of the most well-known. Few will argue that they are not of historical interest. And some would say that they contain words of wisdom for preachers (lay or ordained) today. Examination of Preachers (1766)
Advice to Preachers (1786)
[1] John R. Tyson, Assist Me to Proclaim: The Life and Hymns of Charles Wesley (Eerdmans, 2007), 82. [2] Richard P. Heitzenrater, Wesley and the People Called Methodists (Nashville: Abingdon, 1995), 237.
1 Comment
KEVIN BETTANY
3/2/2026 04:01:05 am
Bethesda Chapel in Hanley, which became part of the City of Stoke-on-Trent when the six towns incorporated in 1925, was called the Cathedral of the Potteries. The first Methodist chapel on the site was built by the Methodist New Connexion in the late 18th century. Finding the building too small for their growing membership, the congregation replaced it with the current building in 1819, to the designs of a local amateur architect. The chapel is built over two stories and is in the Italianate style, with further work to expand the building completed in 1859 and 1887.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
Archives
March 2026
|
RSS Feed